Legal Opinion

E. B. Elliott Adv. Co., Henry F. Hill, Intervenor-Appellant v. Metropolitan Dade County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 29, 1970No. 27589PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge:

This is a consolidated class action seeking a declaratory judgment that Dade County Ordinance No. 63-26, as amended (1968), Code of Metropolitan Dade County, § 33-121.10-17, dealing with the erection and maintenance of outdoor advertising signs adjacent to all expressways in Dade County, is unconstitutional. The District Court for the Southern District of Florida held that the ordinance bears a rational relationship to the constitutionally permissible objectives of safety, aesthetics and economic welfare and does not prescribe the taking of property without just…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Southwest Airlines Company v. Texas International Airlines, Inc. v. Texas Aeronautics Commission, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. James O. Pollard, Etc. v. Lila Cockrell, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Zabel v. TabbCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. City of Miami Beach v. Rocio Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API