Blades v. City of Raleigh
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
A suit to determine the validity of a city zoning ordinance is a proper case for a declaratory judgment. G.S. 1-254; Woodard v. Carteret County, 270 N.C. 55, 153 S.E. 2d 809. The plaintiffs, owners of property in the adjoining area affected by the ordinance, are parties in interest entitled to maintain the action. Jackson v. Board of Adjustment, 275 N.C. 155, 166 S.E. 2d 78; Zopfi v. City of Wilmington, 273 N.C. 430, 160 S.E. 2d 325. The propriety of a summary judgment in such action is governed by the same rules applicable to other actions. G.S. 1A-1, Rules 56(a) and (b), and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Wakefield v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Jackson v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Allred v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Bicycle Transit Authority, Inc. v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Taylor v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Godfrey v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Union CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.