Legal Opinion

Zopfi v. City of Wilmington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1968No. 191PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

The plaintiffs do not complain of any restriction imposed by the zoning ordinances upon their rights to use their own properties as they wish to use them. The ordinances in question leave the plaintiffs free to do that. What the plaintiffs seek is an adjudication that Mrs. Morton and Mrs. Cocke are not entitled to make the uses of their property which they wish to make of it and which the ordinances in question purport to permit.

To arrive at this result the plaintiffs seek an adjudication that the amending ordinances permitting such uses of the Morton-Cocke land are void, so as to leave in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Helms v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. In Re Appeal of ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Marshall v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. City of Elizabeth v. AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Higbee v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Jackson v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Taylor v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API