Legal Opinion
United Advertising Corp. v. Borough of Raritan
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided December 22, 1952PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
William J. Brennan, Jr., J.
The Billboard Act of 1930, imposing annual license and permit fees upon those in the business of outdoor advertising who locate and maintain billboards and other structures for outdoor advertising, was revised and supplanted by the Billboard Act of 1942, but, while carrying forward many of the provisions of the former law, expanding upon some and adding new matter, the 1942 law does not include a clause from section 8 of the former act providing “nor shall any such permit be issued to erect or maintain any such billboard or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Valentine v. ChrestensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Packer Corp. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- St. Louis Poster Advertising Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- City of University Park v. BennersTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- E. B. Elliott Adv. Co., Henry F. Hill, Intervenor-Appellant v. Metropolitan Dade County, a Political Subdivision of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Norate Corp. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.