Legal Opinion
A-S-P Associates v. City of Raleigh
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 3, 1979No. 103PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Justice.
Associates’ appeal to the Court of Appeals assigned error to the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant City. Summary judgment may, when appropriate, be rendered against the party moving for such judgment. Blades v. City of Raleigh, 280 N.C. 531, 187 S.E. 2d 35 (1972); Bland v. Bland, 21 N.C. App. 192, 203 S.E. 2d 639 (1974). Summary judgment in favor of the non-movant is appropriate when the evidence presented demonstrates that no material issues of fact are in dispute, and the non-movant is entitled to entry of judgment as a matter of law.
Associates argue in their…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- State v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Meads v. North Carolina Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Responsible Citizens in Opposition to the Flood Plain Ordinance v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Sheaffer v. County of ChathamDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.