Legal Opinion
Winter v. Cath-dr/Balti Joint Venture
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 17, 2007No. 2006-1359PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MOORE. Opinion dissenting-in - part filed by Circuit Judge PROST.
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
The Secretary of the Navy (Navy) appeals the decision of the Armed Services *1341Board of Contract Appeals (Board) finding in favor of Cath-dr/Balti Joint Venture (Cath) on 13 of 37 claims for an equitable adjustment in contract price. Cath-dr/Balti Joint Venture, ASBCA Nos. 53581, 54239, 05-2 BCA ¶ 33046 (Aug. 17, 2005) (Board Opinion). The Navy asserts that the Board erred in concluding that a Resident Officer in Charge of Contracts1 (ROICC), who was also the Project…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- H. Landau & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Timothy Brainard v. American Skandia Life Assurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Harbert/lummus Agrifuels Projects, Harbert International, Inc., Abb Lummus Crest, Inc. And Lummus Crest, Inc., Plaintiffs-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
3Cited by53 opinions
- Three S Consulting v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Marchena v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- BioFunction, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Snyder & Associates Aquisitions LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Doe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.