Legal Opinion
BioFunction, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 26, 2010No. 07-67CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HODGES, Judge.
Plaintiff entered into a written contract with the United States Postal Service in May 2003 for consulting services. BioFunction agreed to operate a pilot program in addition to its work under the express contract, at no cost to the Government, in exchange for an endorsement letter if the Postal Service liked the program.1 The side agreement was an *170oral one, made between plaintiff and a Post Office employee who did not have authority to bind the Government.
The contract expired in December 2004, but plaintiff continued to run the pilot program until the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- City of El Centro v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Sommers Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Atlas Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Thomas F. Neenan, as Trustee of the Thomas F. Neenan, Sr. Revocable Trust v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Americopters, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Horn & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.