Legal Opinion

Harbert/lummus Agrifuels Projects, Harbert International, Inc., Abb Lummus Crest, Inc. And Lummus Crest, Inc., Plaintiffs-Cross v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 27, 1998No. 97-5047, 97-5052PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

The United States seeks review of the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims in Harbert/Lummus v. United States, 36 Fed. Cl. 494 (1996), holding that the United States entered into an oral, unilateral contract with Harbert/Lummus 1 to continue guaranteeing future borrowing requests until completion of a construction project and awarding Harbert/Lummus damages for breach of this contract. Har-bert/Lummus cross-appeals, seeking review of the trial court’s method of calculating these damages and refusal to recognize the existence of a second contract…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. City of El Centro v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. bell/heery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Township of Saddle Brook v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. United States v. Stephen J. FlemmiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  4. Three S Consulting v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Arakaki v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API