Legal Opinion
Marchena v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 21, 2016No. 16-76CPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Breach of Contract; Actual Authority of Government Agents; Motion to Dismiss; Rule 15(a)(2) Motion to Amend
OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
Plaintiff, a Government informant named Harold C. Marchena, claims that the Government breached a contract with him when it failed to help him secure money from a large asset forfeiture in a criminal case. Marchena argues that agents working on behalf of the Government promised him that they would use best efforts to help him secure the money in return for his assistance in procuring the testimony of several acquaintances, but ' that the Government has…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Moda Health Plan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- K-Con Building Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Chapman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.