Legal Opinion

Child v. City of Jackson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Jackson. (Peck, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The. facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDurand, J.

This action was brought to recover money-paid, under protest, to the city of Jackson for an auctioneer's license. The case was tried before the court without, a jury, who rendered judgment for the defendant.

*504No request for findings either of law or fact was made, as required by Circuit Court Eule No. 87, nor did the judge make any such findings. This Court, therefore, has nothing to review, as has been repeatedly held, and this case will be governed by Haines v. Saviers, ante, 440.

The judgment will be affirmed, with costs of this Court.

The other Justices concurred.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. McDonell v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Moore v. Royal Oak Lumber & Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Old Second National Bank v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Rice v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Markey v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API