Legal Opinion

Silfver v. Daenzer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1911No. Docket No. 36PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Newaygo; Sessions, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Oscar Silfver against George F. Daenzer for money bad and received. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

This is an action on the common counts to recover the down payment on a land contract because of the vendor’s defective title.

The following bill of particulars was filed:

Take notice that the following is a bill of particulars of the plaintiff’s demand in this cause, and for the recovery of which this action is brought, to wit:

1907. Sept. 27. Money paid to the defendant by the plaintiff as a part of the purchase price of the following described lands situated in the township of Sherman, county of Newaygo and State of Michigan, viz.: The east half (E. -J) of the N. E. ¿ of section 3; the north…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dresel v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Wright v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Markey v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Allen v. TalbotMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Adadow v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Billig v. GoodrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. BushmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Murphy v. BonewellMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API