Township of Cumming v. Schick
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ogemaw. (Simpson, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The record in this case contains the testimony offered on the trial and the judgment. No exceptions were taken to rulings on the trial, but it is sought to review the conclusion of the trial judge upon the whole testimony, though no findings of fact or of law were requested. Under these circumstances we cannot review the conclusions reached by the trial judge. We have no means of knowing definitely the grounds upon which the trial judge proceeded. The defeated party has not a right to a trial de novo in this Court. The case is ruled by Haines v. Saviers, 93 Mich. 440, and cases cited.
Judgment…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Haines v. SaviersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moore v. Royal Oak Lumber & Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Old Second National Bank v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Gemberling v. LazarusMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Barnum v. AndrewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Markey v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.