Legal Opinion

McMaster v. Strickland

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 1, 1996No. 24454PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

In this action for specific performance of a land sales contract, Appellant Charles Strickland appeals the Special Referee’s award of both general damages and specific performance to the sellers. Strickland also appeals the award of attorney’s fees to the sellers. Because general damages and specific performance are alternative remedies, we reverse the award of specific performance but retain the general damages award.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On October 2, 1987, Charles Strickland (“Purchaser”) entered into a contract with Respondent McMaster, Fishburne, and Martin…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blumberg v. Nealco, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Charles County Broadcasting Co. v. MearesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Beard v. S/E JOINT VENTURECourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Mortgage Loan Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  5. Bannon v. KnaussCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Prince George Parish v. GuideOne Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. Truck South, Inc. v. PatelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Williamson v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Williamson v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API