Legal Opinion · Dissent

Williamson v. Middleton

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 7, 2007No. 4243Published

1DissentAnderson, J.

I disagree with the majority’s reasoning and analysis and VOTE to REVERSE the award of fees.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

For several years, Middleton worked for Williamson as a commissioned salesman. When Middleton quit working for Williamson, he was due a commission for having sold yarn pallets to one of Williamson’s customers. Middleton and Williamson disagreed as to the amount of commission due, and Williamson never paid Middleton any commission, even though it acknowledged owing him $906.62.

*433After leaving his employment with Williamson, Middleton began working for Peninsula Plastics, Inc.,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Staubes v. City of Folly BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Charleston County Parks & Recreation Commission v. SomersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Byrd v. Irmo High SchoolSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Jackson v. SpeedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API