Legal Opinion
Williamson v. Middleton
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided May 7, 2007No. 4243Published
1Opinion of the Court
374 S.C. 419 (2007)
649 S.E.2d 57
Dan F. WILLIAMSON and Dan F. Williamson and Company, Appellants,
v.
Alfred C. MIDDLETON, Respondent.
No. 4243.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina.
Heard November 8, 2006.
Decided May 7, 2007.
Rehearing Denied August 24, 2007.
Desa A. Ballard, of W. Columbia, for Appellants.
James C. Parham, Patricia S. Revenhorst, and Wallace K. Lightsey, for Respondents.
HEARN, C.J.
Dan F. Williamson and Dan F. Williamson and Company (collectively, "Williamson") appeal from the trial judge's award of attorneys' fees to Alfred C. Middleton. Williamson argues that Middleton is not entitled…
Also in this document: Dissent · Anderson; Dissent · Short.
2Cases cited50 opinions
- I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Staubes v. City of Folly BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Charleston County Parks & Recreation Commission v. SomersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Byrd v. Irmo High SchoolSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Jackson v. SpeedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.