Legal Opinion

Bannon v. Knauss

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 4, 1984No. 0247PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

This is an action for damages for breach of a contract to purchase real estate. The sellers, James and Sally Bannon, sued the purchaser, Donald Knauss. The trial resulted in a jury verdict of $17,300 for the Bannons. Knauss appeals. We affirm.

The Bannons owned an unimproved ocean front lot in Sea Pines Plantation on Hilton Head Island. On April 25,1980, Knauss executed a written offer on a standard form real estate contract offering to purchase the lot for $330,000. The lot was one of the few remaining ocean front lots in Sea Pines and was apparently the only one on the market at…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Southeastern Land Fund, Inc. v. Real Estate World, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Blakeley v. RabonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Stewart v. Griffith Ex Rel. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Champion v. WhaleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Tate v. LeMasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Benya v. GambleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Silver v. Aabstract Pools & Spas, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Laser Supply and Services, Inc. v. Orchard Park AssociatesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Sheek v. LeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Jackson v. Midlands Human Resources CenterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API