Legal Opinion
Blumberg v. Nealco, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 22, 1993No. 23809PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Blumberg v. Nealco, Inc., — S.C. —, 416 S.E. (2d) 211 (Ct. App. 1992). Petitioners Theresa L. Blumberg, Robert L. Blumberg, Frederick Loef, Trust, by Frederick J. Loef, and Frederick J. Loef (Blumberg) contend the Court of Appeals erred in reversing without remand the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees. We affirm as modified.
FACTS
In September 1987, Blumberg and Respondents (Nealco) executed a five-year lease. The lease provided for reasonable attorney’s fees if Nealco failed to comply with its terms. In August 1988,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hegler v. Gulf Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Baron Data Systems, Inc. v. LoterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Collins v. CollinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- Gainey v. GaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- Farmers and Merchants Bank v. FargnoliSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Jackson v. SpeedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Dixon v. Besco Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- Maybank v. BB&T Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
- Charleston Lumber Co. v. Miller Housing Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- Crestwood Golf Club, Inc. v. PotterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.