Legal Opinion · Dissent

Truck South, Inc. v. Patel

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 29, 1998No. 2862Published

1DissentHearn, Judge

Respectfully, I dissent. Judge Whetstone did not err in refusing to change venue. Likewise, Judge Dennis’s grant of summary judgment was proper.

I. Venue

The plain language of South Carolina Code section 15-7-10(1) requires that Track South’s lawsuit against Sudhir D. Patel be brought in Colleton County, the county where the property is located. S.C.Code Ann. § 15-7-10(1) (1977). Section 15-7-10(1) applies to any action that requires a determination of any “right or interest” in real property. Because this is an action for specific performance of real estate, it clearly affects rights and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First National Co. v. StrakSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. McMaster v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Smothers v. Richland Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Barrow v. GowdySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  5. Chet Adams Co. v. James F. Pedersen Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API