Legal Opinion

Henderson Homes, Inc. v. City of Bothell

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 24, 1992No. 26627-6-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

This action was brought by respondent developers, Dujardin Development Company, Conner Development Company, and Henderson Homes, Inc., for a refund of money paid to the City of Bothell (Bothell) as park impact mitigation fees imposed as a condition of Bothell's approval of preliminary plats for three separate subdivisions proposed by the three developers. They allege that Bothell's assessment and expenditure of the park impact mitigation fees violated RCW 82.02.020.

Bothell contended below, inter alia, that the action was barred by the 30-day statute of limitations period established by RCW…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hillis Homes, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. RothWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Deschenes v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Trimen Development Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Henderson Homes, Inc. v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Castle Homes and Development, Inc. v. City of BrierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. Citizens' Alliance for Property Rights v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Vintage Construction Co. v. City of BothellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API