Legal Opinion

Vintage Construction Co. v. City of Bothell

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 16, 1996No. 36209-7-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

The City of Bothell conditioned approval of a subdivision on the payment of a $400-per-lot fee. Both-ell contends its methodology for calculating the fee satisfies the statute that permits a fee "in lieu of a dedication” of land for park purposes. Under Trimen Dev. Co. v. King County, 2 a fee in lieu of dedication is permissible only if it is based on the value of land which the developer could be required to dedicate. Because Bothell did not determine in a site-specific manner the value of the land the developer could have been required to dedicate, the fee is invalid and must be refunded.

Thi…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trimen Development Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Henderson Homes, Inc. v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Henderson Homes, Inc. v. City of BothellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of CamasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. United Development Corp. v. City of Mill CreekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Vintage Construction Co. v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. VINTAGE CONSTRUCTION CO. v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Isla Verde Intern. Holdings, Ltd. v. City of CamasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API