Legal Opinion
South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1984No. 49250-6PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
Respondent, South Hollywood Hills Citizens Association for the Preservation of Neighborhood Safety and the Environment (Association), sought a writ of review challenging the King County Council's approval of a plat. The trial court ruled that the Association had failed to exhaust administrative remedies and had untimely joined indispensable parties. It dismissed the writ, the Court of Appeals reversed and we granted review. The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King Cy., 33 Wn. App. 169, 653 P.2d 1324 (1982).
I
This dispute arises from the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zylstra v. PivaWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- North Street Ass'n v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Ackerley Communications, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Presbytery of Seattle v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Baldwin v. Sisters of Providence in Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Citizens for Mount Vernon v. City of Mount VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.