Robinson v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court · GuyGuy, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a dismissal of their class
action. Roy and Kathleen Robinson and that class of persons similarly situated seek reversal of a trial court's rulings which dismissed their civil rights actions against the City of Seattle and individual officials, applied a 3-year statute of limitation to their claims for refunds of payments they made under the City of Seattle's Housing Preservation Ordinance, and denied their request for reasonable attorney fees. The City of Seattle (City) cross-appeals, arguing the trial court erred in awarding the partial refund. We will refer to the…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Souter.
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by201 opinions
- Berschauer/Phillips Construction Co. v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Hillis v. State, Dept. of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
196 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.