Hillis Homes, Inc. v. Snohomish County
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.
Consolidated appeals from Snohomish and San Juan Counties challenge the validity of county ordinances which impose fees on new residential subdivisions and housing proposals. We hold that such fees are taxes and that the Legislature has not granted to the counties authority to impose such taxes. Accordingly, the fees are invalid.
Both Snohomish and San Juan Counties imposed fees on new residential developments in response to financial difficulties precipitated by significant population increases within the Counties. We will outline the measures taken by each County before considering the facts…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carkonen v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- City of Spokane v. Spokane Police GuildWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Pacific First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Haugen v. GLEASONOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- State ex rel. Nettleton v. CaseWashington Supreme Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Covell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.