State v. Roth
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.
This is an action in eminent domain. The property owners appeal from a judgment which failed to include an award for attorney and expert witness fees.
Article 1, section 16 of the Washington State Constitution, as amended by amendment 9, provides that private property shall not be taken or damaged for public use without “just compensation” having first been made. Originally the determination of “just compensation” was limited to an inquiry of the fair cash market value of the property involved. In re Medina, 69 Wn.2d 574, 418 P.2d 1020 (1966); In re Issaquah, 31 Wn.2d 556, 197 P.2d 1018 (1948).
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hagan v. Chinook Hotel, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
- Vannoy v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
- In Re City of MedinaWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Town of Issaquah v. GordonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Blume v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by81 opinions
- Schmidt v. Cornerstone Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re the Personal Restraint of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. CostichWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. CostichWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Harmon v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.