Legal Opinion
McClure v. City of Springfield
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 20, 2001No. 2000-115; A113253PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
The City of Springfield (the city) seeks review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision remanding, for the second time, its approval of a land partition sought by Robert and Sharon McClure (the McClures). As pertinent here, the city imposed conditions requiring dedications of property for a street right-of-way, a sidewalk, and a “clipped corner” for vision clearance purposes. The McClures cross-petition for review, asserting that LUBA erred in upholding the proposed street right-of-way exaction. We affirm.
In McClure v. City of Springfield, 37 Or LUBA 759 (2000), LUBA remanded the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Schultz v. City of Grants PassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- J.C. Reeves Corp. v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Art Piculell Group v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3296, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4562 Faye Garneau, Edward Garneau, Robert Klepinger, Nicolas Fedan, Richard Ju, Triad Development, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. City of Seattle, a Municipal Corporation, and the Tenants Union, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rogers MacHinery, Inc. v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Hallmark Inns & Resorts, Inc. v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Brown v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Hill v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- B.A.M. Development, L.L.C. v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.