Legal Opinion

Dolan v. City of Tigard

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 24, 1994No. 93-518PublishedCited by 978 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist

Petitioner challenges the decision of the Oregon Supreme Court which held that the city of Tigard could condition the approval of her building permit on the dedication of a portion of her property for flood control and traffic improvements. 317 Ore. 110, 854 P. 2d 437 (1993). We granted certiorari to resolve a question left open by our decision in Nollan v. California Coastal Comm’n, 483 U. S. 825 (1987), of what is the required degree of connection between the exactions imposed by the city and the projected impacts of the proposed development.

I

The State of Oregon enacted a comprehensive land…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by978 opinions

  1. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Knick v. Township of ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 2019

973 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API