Legal Opinion
Hallmark Inns & Resorts, Inc. v. City of Lake Oswego
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 14, 2004No. 2002-049; A121798PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
This case is before us for a second time. See Hallmark Inns & Resorts v. City of Lake Oswego, 186 Or App 710, 65 P3d 300 (2003) (Hallmark I). Following our prior decision and remand, the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) again upheld a decision of the City of Lake Oswego (city) that denied petitioner Hallmark Inns & Resorts, Inc.’s request that the city modify a development review permit issued in 1993 so as to eliminate any requirement that Hallmark provide a public pedestrian pathway across its property to connect a residential area on one side of the development to a shopping center on the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Schultz v. City of Grants PassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- J.C. Reeves Corp. v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Art Piculell Group v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cook v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Utah Chapter of the Sierra Club v. Board of Oil, Gas, & MiningUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Brown v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- 34 Fitzsimonds Rd 3-Lot SD - Decision on MotionsVermont Superior Court · 2019
- F.P. Development, LLC. v. Charter Twp. of Canton, Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.