Legal Opinion

Schultz v. City of Grants Pass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 2, 1994No. 92-CV-0006; CA A77006PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

The City of Grants Pass (the city) approved petitioners’ application to partition a parcel of property, subject to a number of conditions. Petitioners requested a writ of review, challenging the constitutionality of the conditions under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The trial court entered judgment in favor of the city. We reverse and remand.

Petitioners own a 3.85-acre parcel of real property, located within the acknowledged urban growth boundary of Grants Pass. The northern boundary of the properly abuts Savage Street. The eastern boundary abuts Beacon Drive. Petitioners wish to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Clark v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Rogers MacHinery, Inc. v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. J.C. Reeves Corp. v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Art Piculell Group v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API