Legal Opinion
Rogers MacHinery, Inc. v. Washington County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 8, 2002No. C971202CV; A104615PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.
Pursuant to ORS 34.010 et seq., Rogers Machinery, Inc., petitioned for a writ of review to challenge the imposition of a Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) assessed under a Washington County ordinance. Respondents are Washington County and the City of Tigard, which jointly administer the ordinance. The TIF is assessed against property developers to provide funds for improvements to city streets and arterials. Petitioner challenges the TIF assessed against it as a taking of its property without just compensation, in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Petitioner also…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dabbs v. Anne Arundel Cnty.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Homebuilders Ass'n v. Tualatin Hills Park & Recreation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Dudek v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Baker v. City of WoodburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Butchart v. Baker CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.