Legal Opinion
J.C. Reeves Corp. v. Clackamas County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 14, 1994No. LUBA 94-027; CA A84694PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s affirmance of the Clackamas County hearings officer’s decision approving, but imposing conditions on, petitioner’s application to develop a 21-lot residential subdivision. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
We take the relevant facts from LUBA’s opinion:
“The subject property is approximately 4.9 acres in size and is zoned Low Density Residential (R-8.5). The subject property is essentially undeveloped and is located within the Portland Metropolitan Area Urban Growth Boundary. The proposed subdivision is a permitted use in the R-8.5 zoning district. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dolan v. City of TigardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Schultz v. City of Grants PassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Dolan v. City of TigardOregon Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by11 opinions
- B.A.M. Development, L.L.C. v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- West Linn Corporate Park LLC v. City of West LinnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Clark v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Rogers MacHinery, Inc. v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Art Piculell Group v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.