Legal Opinion

Brown v. City of Medford

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 5, 2012No. 082689L7; A147176PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Plaintiff applied to the City of Medford for approval to partition his parcel into a northern lot and southern lot. The city’s planning commission approved a tentative plan of the partition, but on the condition that plaintiff dedicate an easement over the southern lot for a future public street. Plaintiff then filed a complaint alleging that the city’s exaction of the easement violated the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution; Article I, section 18, of the Oregon Constitution; and ORS 197.796. After a series of pretrial rulings, the city stipulated to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hill v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. KOGAP Enterprises, Inc v. City of MedfordDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API