Brown v. City of Medford
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
Plaintiff applied to the City of Medford for approval to partition his parcel into a northern lot and southern lot. The city’s planning commission approved a tentative plan of the partition, but on the condition that plaintiff dedicate an easement over the southern lot for a future public street. Plaintiff then filed a complaint alleging that the city’s exaction of the easement violated the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution; Article I, section 18, of the Oregon Constitution; and ORS 197.796. After a series of pretrial rulings, the city stipulated to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hill v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- KOGAP Enterprises, Inc v. City of MedfordDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024