Legal Opinion

Bear Claw Tribe, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 12, 1996No. Congressional Reference No. 92-719XPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REPORT OF THE HEARING OFFICER

FUTEY, Hearing Officer:

This congressional reference case is before the hearing officer on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff, Bear Claw Tribe, Inc., alleges that defendant, United States, failed in its duty to hold a particular parcel of real property for plaintiffs benefit. Defendant argues that the statute of limitations bars any legal claim. Further, defendant asserts that plaintiff has no valid legal or equitable claim because defendant was under no general duty to refrain from selling the land. Defendant also contends that it owed no duty to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kanehl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  2. McDonald v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  3. Figueroa v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  4. Pride v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  5. Dwen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API