Figueroa v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
FUTEY, Judge.
This case concerning the payment and allocation of patent fees is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Defendant maintains that the court lacks jurisdiction over plaintiffs Patents and Copyrights Clause1 (Patent Clause) claim because: (1) the phrase “[t]o promote the Progress of ... useful Arts” is not a substantive limit on Congress’ power; (2) the Patent Clause “does not in any way confer a substantive right on any…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Starr International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Michels v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Dwen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Starr International Company, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- American Savings Bank, F.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.