Pride v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. The parties dispute plaintiffs entitlement to receive the monies due her resulting from the correction of her late husband’s military record. Defendant argues that plaintiffs claim is time-barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Plaintiff counters that she timely filed her complaint and that she is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Factual Background
Plaintiff is the widow of Chief Master Sergeant (CMSgt.) Carl…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tindle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Hopi Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Osborn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Gallucci v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Seay v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.