Dwen v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The parties frame the questions presented in the following manner. Defendant maintains that plaintiffs are belatedly seeking just compensation for an alleged taking. Defendant contends that plaintiffs’ claim is barred by the court’s six-year statute of limitations found in 28 U.S.C. § 2501. Defendant also asserts that the court is without jurisdiction to issue a declaratory judgment in the context of this case. Plaintiffs, on the other hand, refute defendant’s…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Katzin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Sonoma Apartment Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Mesa Grande Band of Mission Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.