Legal Opinion

McDonald v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 2, 1997No. Nos. 92-116L, 92-367LPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FUTEY, Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ consolidated cases for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1). Defendant argues that plaintiffs’ alleged taking causes of actions are time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations. Plaintiffs maintain that they timely filed their complaints.

Factual Background

Plaintiffs, Charles G. McDonald (plaintiff McDonald); and David N. Crawford, John A. Crawford, Robert V. Crawford, A. Lambert Voorhies, and Mireille V. Martin (collectively plaintiffs Crawford), own adjacent lands in St. Landry…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  5. Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Entines v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  3. BMR Gold Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. Barney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. Pride v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API