Compuware Corp. v. International Business MacHines
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND GIVING PLAINTIFF THE OPPORTUNITY TO AMEND ITS COMPLAINT
STEEH, District Judge.
Both parties in this case compete in the market for Mainframe Software Tools. Such tools are designed to improve the productivity of various “high end” mainframe computers created by defendant International Business Machines (“IBM”). This case arises out of plaintiff Compu-ware’s allegations that, with regard to its Mainframe Software Tools, IBM infringed Compuware’s copyrights, misappropriated trade secrets, tortiously interfered with…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Pete Bouldis v. U.S. Suzuki Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ajuba International, L.L.C. v. SahariaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
- Atlas Technologies, LLC v. LevineDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Aware, Inc. v. CENTILLIUM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Dumas v. Hurley Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Saab Automobile AB v. General Motors Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.