Legal Opinion
Pete Bouldis v. U.S. Suzuki Motor Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 27, 1983No. 82-3277PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Bold-Morr, Inc. a former Suzuki motorcycle dealership, appeals a summary judgment dismissing its claim that defendants, U.S. Suzuki Motor Corporation and Daryl Lucian, a district sales manager for Suzuki, had committed a number of violations under the federal antitrust laws. The other plaintiffs, Pete Bouldis and Norman Morris, are officers and sole stockholders of Bold-Morr. In its complaint Bold-Morr sought treble damages, alleging that cer tain of Suzuki’s business policies and practices violated § 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended by the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Paul Bender, George and Diane Decarlo v. Southland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Thomas J. Kline, Inc. v. Lorillard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Alan's of Atlanta, Inc. v. Minolta Corporation, Robert Lathrop, Wolf Camera, Inc., and Charles WolfCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- A.I. Root Company v. Computer/dynamics, Inc. And Management Assistance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Dana Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.