Saab Automobile AB v. General Motors Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [# 9]
GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. The parties had oral arguments on June 10, 2013. For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.
II. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL HISTORY
Plaintiffs filed this action on August 6, 2012. This case arises from a state-law claim of alleged Tortious Interference with Economic Expectancy. Plaintiff Saab Automobile AB (“Saab”) is a company, currently in receivership, organized under the laws of Sweden with its principal place…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Association of Cleveland Fire Fighters v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Uhl v. Komatsu Forklift Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Atlas Technologies, LLC v. LevineDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Hobart-Mayfield, Inc. v. NOCSAECourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- AirPro Diagnostics, LLC v. Drew Technologies, IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- BERROCAL v. Refloor LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Hobart-Mayfield, Inc. v. National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic EquipmentDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.