Legal Opinion
United States v. Grinnell Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 13, 1966No. 73PublishedCited by 2,424 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
This case presents an important question under § 2 of the Sherman Act,1 which makes it an offense for any person to “monopolize . . . any part of the trade or commerce among the several States.” This is a civil suit brought by the United States against Grinnell Corporation (Grinnell), American District Telegraph Co. (ADT), Holmes Electric Protective Co. (Holmes) and Automatic Fire Alarm Co. of Delaware (AFA). The District Court held for the Government and entered a decree. All parties appeal,2 the United States because it deems the relief inadequate and the defendants both on the merits and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,424 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
2,419 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.