Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
Justice White delivered
the opinion of the Court.
Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 2, makes it an offense for any person to “monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States . . . .” The jury in this case returned a verdict finding that petitioners had monopolized, attempted to monopolize, and/or conspired to monopolize. The District Court entered a judgment rul ing that petitioners had violated §2, and the Court of Appeals affirmed on the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by661 opinions
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- In Re Visa Check/mastermoney Antitrust Litigation. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Limited, Inc., Sears Roebuck & Company, Safeway Inc., Circuit City Stores, Inc., National Retail Federation and the Food Marketing Institute, International Mass Retail Association, and All Similarly Situated Persons v. Visa U.S.A. Inc. And Mastercard International IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Pepsico, Inc. v. The Coca-Cola CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
656 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.