Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Cano

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 26, 2005No. 04-0291/ARPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge ERDMANN

delivered the opinion of the court.

Specialist Arturo Cano entered pleas of not guilty to one specification of sodomy with a child under twelve, three specifications of indecent acts with a child under sixteen, and one specification of indecent liberties with a child under sixteen in violation of Articles 125 and 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 925, 934 (2000). He was tried and convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial and sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for seventeen years, forfeiture of all pay and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BledsoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. United States v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  3. United States v. HartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. SantosCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  5. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrowCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  2. United States v. YammineCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  3. United States v. Sergeant ERIC D. SHORTSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  4. United States v. YammineNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
  5. United States v. HarrowCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API