Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Diaz

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided February 4, 1997No. 95-1066; Crim.App. No. 92-0955PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial in September and October 1991 at Twentynine Palms, California. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of having carnal knowledge with a 14-year-old girl, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 920. He was sentenced by officer members to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 9 months, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted pay grade. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence on April 15, 1992. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed on June 19, 1995, in an unpublished opinion.

On…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. Vinal S. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. WeeksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  5. United States v. Demareo Lamont Davis, United States of America v. Dwayne Buford ReedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. TooheyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  3. United States v. GunkleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  4. United States v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  5. United States v. RobersonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API