Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Hart

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 26, 1990No. 61,928; CM 8702407PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*408 Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, Specialist Hart was convicted by a general court-martial of one specification each of maiming, assault intentionally inflicting grievous bodily harm, and being drunk and disorderly — violations of Articles 124, 128, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 924, 928, and 934, respectively. The court members sentenced appellant to a discharge from the Army with a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 3 years, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening authority approved these results,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  2. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  3. United States v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
  4. United States v. DancyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  5. United States v. ModestoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API