People v. Bledsoe
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, J.
Defendant William McKee Bledsoe appeals from a conviction of forcible rape. (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (2).) The principal issue on appeal is the propriety of the trial court’s admission of expert testimony by a rape counselor that, after the incident in question, the alleged victim suffered from “rape trauma syndrome.” As we explain, although in a rape prosecution expert testimony on the after effects of rape may be admitted for a variety of purposes, we conclude that the evidence in this case was not admissible for the purpose for which it was offered—namely, to prove that a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by211 opinions
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. RowlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.