Legal Opinion

People v. Bledsoe

California Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1984No. Crim. 23106PublishedCited by 211 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, J.

Defendant William McKee Bledsoe appeals from a conviction of forcible rape. (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (2).) The principal issue on appeal is the propriety of the trial court’s admission of expert testimony by a rape counselor that, after the incident in question, the alleged victim suffered from “rape trauma syndrome.” As we explain, although in a rape prosecution expert testimony on the after effects of rape may be admitted for a variety of purposes, we conclude that the evidence in this case was not admissible for the purpose for which it was offered—namely, to prove that a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by211 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. People v. RowlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API