United States v. Harrow
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Judge RYAN
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Appellant argues that three evidentiary errors during her trial require this Court to overturn her conviction for the unpremeditated murder of her infant daughter. She also alleges errors arising from her guilty plea to larceny, the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals’ sentence reassessment, as well as from post-trial and appellate delay. We address each of these six issues. Although we conclude that this case is not without error, we hold that the errors did not prejudice Appellant. Therefore, for the reasons stated below, we affirm…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. CustisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. YammineCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. DacusCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.