Legal Opinion
Baranov v. Scudder
California Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 1918No. L. A. No. 3941PublishedCited by 18 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This cause comes before us on rehearing after decision by the district court of appeal. After further consideration of the cause, we approve the opinion of that court prepared by Mr. Justice Works. It is as follows:
“This is an appeal from the judgment and from an order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial.
“On September 11, 1912, appellant executed to respondent a sublease of a storeroom held by the former under a lease from the Western Union Telegraph Company. Respondent remained in possession of the property until he- was evicted through process of law, in August or September, 1913, in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mineral Park Land Co. v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Carlson v. SheehanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Wilmington Transportation Co. v. O'NeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Geer v. Boston Little Circle Zinc Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
- Williams v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Canfield v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Beckett v. City of Paris Dry Goods Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Standard Livestock Co. v. PentzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.