Legal Opinion

Beckett v. City of Paris Dry Goods Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1939No. S. F. 16283PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

In this case, the court is called upon to determine whether a contract made by the parties is a lease or only a license to occupy certain property. The plaintiff recovered damages for unlawful eviction, but the trial judge refused to allow certain amounts claimed and each of the parties has appealed from the judgment.

The defendant agreed in writing with the plaintiff, who is an optometrist, that the latter might, for a period of three years, conduct a first-class optical department in its large store. The space to be occupied at any time was to be designated by the defendant, which was to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Samuels v. OttingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Baranov v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Landon v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Golden West Baseball Co. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Jo-Mark Sand & Gravel Co. v. PantanellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  4. Sproul v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. O'Shea v. Claude C. Wood Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API