Legal Opinion

Keeler v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1970No. Sac. 7853PublishedCited by 338 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION

In this proceeding for writ of prohibition we are called upon to decide whether an unborn but viable fetus is a "human being" within the meaning of the California statute defining murder (Pen. Code, § 187). We conclude that the Legislature did not intend such a meaning, and that for us to construe the statute to the contrary…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by338 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Carlos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

333 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API