Mineral Park Land Co. v. Howard
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $3,650. The appeal is on the judgment-roll alone.
The plaintiff was the owner of certain land in the ravine or wash known as the Arroyo Seco in South Pasadena, Los Angeles County. The defendants had made a contract with the public authorities for the construction of a concrete bridge across the Arroyo Seco. In August, 1911, the parties to this action entered into a written agreement whereby the plaintiff granted to the defendants the right to haul gravel and earth from plaintiff’s land, the defendants agreeing to take therefrom…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Klauber v. San Diego St.-Car Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Muhlenberg v. HenningSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Wilmington Transportation Co. v. O'NeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Diamond Iron Mining Co. v. Buckeye Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Lloyd v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Transatlantic Financing Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. v. City of Rancho CucamongaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Ringle Development Corporation v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.